Strange one - a reversal of procedure
A couple of weeks ago, I ran into a strange situation. The group insisted that the correct procedure was to adopt a motion and then to amend it. They has trouble understanding that amendments had to be proposed and adopted before the final passage of the motion. Anybody ever run into that?
What was the circumstance?
If they were creating a policy for the organization, they could pass it and then amend it. They may have confused that "can" with "should."
That was not the situation. The opinion was that you pass a motion and then you amend it.